One-on-One Psychedelic Experiences: Advantages & Drawbacks
In This Article:
- Introduction
- One-On-One Experiences
- Advantages of a One-on-One Experience
- Higher Level of Attention and Personalised Support
- Minimised External Disturbances
- Tailored Setting
- Drawbacks of a One-on-OneExperience
- Limited Shared Experience
- Potential Isolation
- Reduced Collective Insights
- Narrower Range of Expertise
- Financial Cost
- Considerations for Choosing One-on-One Vs. Group Experiences
- Final Thoughts
Introduction
One-On-One Experiences
one-on-one experiences are where a single person takes a dose and is supported through their experience by one facilitator. This may also be in the form of 1-2; an individual with two facilitators. The pros and cons of 1-2 are by and large the same as one-on-one (as compared to groups) so what I will outline here applies to both.
Advantages of a One-on-One Experience
Higher Level of Attention and Personalised Support
From the facilitator’s perspective, there is only one person to focus on. This means the attention is not divided between a group and the individual can receive a higher level of care. This means they can be highly attuned and receptive to that individual and their needs. This includes needs of emotional support, guiding, or any of the other types of support that a psychonaut may need or would help them with their process.
It also means that they will receive personalised support. For example, if the music needs changing, it can be changed with one person in mind. If they would like more fresh air in the space a window can be opened. If they want silence they can have silence.
In a group experience, facilitators must balance the needs and desires of all the individuals present. In a one-on-one experience the considerations of others aren’t an issue and won’t compromise decisions made around how to guide the experience. If the the tripper wants or needs support navigating through some challenging aspect of their journey, the facilitator can help immediately.
Knowing that you have the undivided attention of a single facilitator can also help to feel more supported and reassured heading into the experience. This can also help with a more ideal state and mindset heading in, leading to a more beneficial experience and outcome.
This level of support extends through preparation, the entirety of the session, and through integration. The increased ability to change and customise also applies to the timing and schedule of the experience.
Minimised External Disturbances
Emotional releases are fairly commonplace and generally invited during psychedelic experiences. This may be in the form of crying, laughing, toning, loud sighing, shaking or otherwise.
For many, when these sounds and vibrations come from other people during a session, they can be distracting. They can pull people out of their inner experience.
In some aspects, we can consider psychedelic sessions to be condensed meditation sessions in that they are a concentrated opportunity to look inside at the deeper levels of our psyche. As is the case with meditation sessions, for us to remain focused on this, it can help to have a quiet environment with minimal unexpected or unpredictable noise from outside.
In the case of a one-on-one experience, there are no others. It is quite literally a more controlled environment. This can help to enhance focus on personal introspection without unplanned external influences. Being a solo also brings more opportunities for moments of solitude that may be crucial for personal processing
Tailored Setting
This can be the case with factors such as indoor or outdoor setting, music, lighting, the size and layout of the space, and how it is decorated.
One may have a preference to be in a sheltered location outside in nature. One may have a preference for classical music. One person might want to be in the corner of a room. In all of these cases, these preferences can be matched to the individual in a one-on-one experience.
In terms of decoration, items in the space can also be matched to a single person. For example, if the person undergoing the experience has a connection to a particular religion, they might have a cross or a small Buddha figurine on display. In a group setting, these might not be welcome or appropriate.
This is a type of personalisation of the setting that can aid in bringing a higher level of comfort and meaning to the tripper.
Drawbacks of a One-on-OneExperience
Although there are many potential advantages to a one-on-one experience, it is also important to be aware of the potential drawbacks.
Limited Shared Experience
Beyond the facilitator who will be present, this means there will not be any others to form connections with. It offers fewer opportunities for openness and connection. Many people find the group aspect with its sharing and bonding to be a crucial part of their process, and individual experiences lack this.
A one-on-one experience won’t offer that same sense of being in something together with others. Although the psychedelic experience may increase feelings of connection, a one-on-one is a more solitary experience.
Potential Isolation
In the wake of new perspectives, the sense that other people ‘just don’t get it’ may be present and more stark in a solitary journey.
This sense of isolation is generally more pronounced or negatively perceived if challenges occur during and after an experience.
As the saying goes ‘sharing the load makes it lighter’.
This sense of isolation is more pronounced if one does not have many other people whom they can talk about their experience with afterward. If considering a one-on-one experience, it is worth thinking about who you will be able to talk about your experience with. It may well be the case you have someone close, friends, or a solid support circle around you. But for many, there are no others they feel they can share openly with.This sharing with others can help with processing, perspective, and a sense of connection. As such a one-on-one may increase the challenges and limit the potential benefits of an experience.
Reduced Collective Insights
These varieties of perspectives usually come from group sharing circles that are typically present in group experiences.
In a one-on-one experience, you may receive reflections and mirroring from your facilitator but it will end there. Depending on their role and style, the facilitator may be more focused on simply holding space and listening, rather than actively offering their perspectives, which usually come more readily from others in a group who have also gone through their own experience in the group session.
This also means the potential for a reduced sense of a sustained healing community moving forward in the weeks and months after the experience.
Narrower Range of Expertise
This is contrasted with a group session where there are normally two, three, or more facilitators present. Different facilitators come from different backgrounds and usually hold their own expertise, so in group settings, you’ll have an opportunity for varied inputs and approaches. If you don’t click with one facilitator, you might well click with another.
In a one-on-one experience, you will have limited exposure to various modalities and practitioner perspectives.
If going for a one-on-one experience, then, it’s ideal if you have an opportunity to speak with them and get to know them a little bit before signing up for an experience. This usually comes by way of a discovery or introduction call. Take this opportunity to ask them any questions about their background, experience, or approach you may have.
It helps if you have an idea of what to look for in a psychedelic guide or tripsitter. Moreover, there is the subjective sense of how comfortable you feel with this person and the sense of trust you have in them. Trust is an important piece that shouldn’t be overlooked as you will be heading into very vulnerable states of being with them, and it is essential that you feel safe opening up in their presence.
-
Financial Cost
This may make the experience inaccessible for some. In other cases, someone may stretch their financial resources or take on extra work to afford this experience. This can bring its own stresses and strains. This extra stress won’t help one in the preparation for a psychedelic trip. A relatively high cost can also lead to greater pressure, or higher expectations on the experience, which can set one up for disappointment if the experience does not meet those expectations.
Considerations for Choosing One-on-One Vs. Group Experiences
When weighing up the pros and cons of one-on-one experiences and groups, it will be helpful to consider the following questions:
- How do you feel about doing it alone?
- In a group, would you be worried that you won’t be supported enough?
- Would you like the dedicated support of someone?
- Would you like the experience of doing it in a group? Do you like group experiences?
- If in a group, what size group would you like? Small like 3 or 4? Medium like 8? Or large like 10 or above?
- What ratio of facilitators to participants would you need to feel supported? 1 facilitator to 2 participants? More? Or less?
Final Thoughts
In the world of supported psychedelic experiences, the choice between group ceremonies and one-on-one sessions holds a spectrum of advantages and drawbacks.
Group experiences offer shared insights and connections, while one-on-one sessions provide personalised attention and focused support. One is neither better than the other, and what suits you will depend on your personal preferences. Each path, although unique in its essence, invites seekers to navigate their trip with intention. Whether amidst a collective experience or in the form of one-on-one guidance, the key lies in choosing a path that resonates deeply, fostering healing, growth, and self-discovery.
Stay safe, journey well.
In This Article:
- Introduction
- One-On-One Experiences
- Advantages of a One-on-One Experience
- Higher Level of Attention and Personalised Support
- Minimised External Disturbances
- Tailored Setting
- Drawbacks of a One-on-OneExperience
- Limited Shared Experience
- Potential Isolation
- Reduced Collective Insights
- Narrower Range of Expertise
- Financial Cost
- Considerations for Choosing One-on-One Vs. Group Experiences
- Final Thoughts